Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Protokol Routing DSDV dan OLSR Untuk Perubahan Kecepatan Mobilitas pada Standar IEEE 802.11ah
Main Article Content
Abstract
Dewasa ini, teknologi informasi yang praktis dan efisien sangatlah dibutuhkan. Jaringan ad hoc merupakan teknologi wireless LAN (WLAN) yang tidak membutuhkan suatu infrastruktur seperti base station pada jaringannya. Akan tetapi, teknologi wireless sering kali memiliki keterbatasan resource. Standar IEEE 802.11ah didesain untuk bekerja pada frekuensi sub – 1 GHz, jangkauan transmisinya mencapai 1 Km, konsumsi daya yang rendah, serta dapat melayani ribuan station untuk sebuah access point. Pada penelitian ini telah membandingkan protokol routing DSDV dan OLSR pada standar IEEE 802.11ah dengan menggunakan NS 3. Sedangkan parameter perbandingan yang digunakan adalah throughput, packet delivery ratio, rata – rata delay, dan konsumsi energi. Berdasarkan hasil yang didapat, protokol routing OLSR memiliki kinerja yang lebih baik dibandingkan protokol routing DSDV pada skenario perubahan kecepatan. Nilai rata – rata throughput untuk OLSR adalah 28400 Bps sedangkan untuk DSDV adalah 2934 Bps. Nilai rata – rata PDR untuk OLSR adalah 14,582 % sedangkan untuk DSDV adalah 2,7 %. Nilai rata – rata delay untuk OLSR adalah 0,04453994 s sedangkan untuk DSDV adalah 0,6261986 s. Sedangkan rasio perbandingan untuk konsumsi energi antara protokol routing OLSR dan DSDV adalah 1,48 % untuk skenario perubahan kecepatan.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
References
[2] Saeed, N. H., Abbod, M. F., & Al-Raweshidy, H. S. (2012, April). MANET routing protocols taxonomy. In Future Communication Networks (ICFCN), 2012 International Conference on. IEEE.
[3] Hazmi, A., Rinne, J., & Valkama, M. (2012, December). Feasibility study of I??? 802.11 ah radio technology for IoT and M2M use cases. In Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), 2012 IEEE. IEEE.
[4] Park, C. W., Hwang, D., & Lee, T. J. (2014). Enhancement of IEEE 802.11 ah MAC for M2M Communications. Communications Letters, IEEE.
[5] Le Tian, Steven Latre, Jeroen Famaey. (2016). An IEEE 802.11ah simulation module for NS-3. University of Antwerp technical report. Retrieved from https://www.uantwerpen.be/en/rg/mosaic/projects/ieee-802-11ah/.
[6] Aust, S., Prasad, R. V., & Niemegeers, I. G. (2012, June). IEEE 802.11 ah: Advantages in standards and further challenges for sub 1 GHz Wi-Fi. In Communications (ICC), 2012 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE.
[7] Qualcomm. Wi-Fi Advanced 802.11ah. Retrieved from: www.Qualcomm.com/Invention/research/projects/wi-fi-evolution/80211ah. Taken on 2015-09-26.
[8] IEEE. Sub 1 GHz license-exempt PAR and 5C. Retrieved from : https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0001-13-0wng900mhz-par-and-5c.doc.
[9] Adame, T., Bel, A., Bellalta, B., Barceló, J., Gonzalez, J., & Oliver, M. (2013). Capacity analysis of IEEE 802.11 ah WLANs for M2M communications. In Multiple Access Communications. Springer International Publishing.
[10] IEEE Std. 802.15.4. Wireless MAC and PHY Specifications for Low-Rate WPANs. 8 Sept., 2006.
[11] Morrow, R. (2002). Bluetooth : Operation and Use. NewYork. McGraw-Hill.
[12] Tsang, T. K., & El-Gamal, M. N. (2005, June). Ultra-wideband (UWB) communications systems: an overview. In IEEE-NEWCAS Conference, 2005. The 3rd International. IEEE.
[13] Nugroho, K., & Utami, R. (2015). Analisis Estimasi Kanal Dengan Menggunakan Metode Invers Matrik Pada Sistem MIMO-OFDM. Jurnal Infotel-Jurnal Informatika, Telekomunikasi dan Elektronika, 7(1), 39-46.
[14] Daneshfar, N. (2015). Performance Enhancement Mechanism of IEEE 802.11 AH Machine Communication System.
[15] Le Tian, Jeroen Famaey, Steven Latré. (2016). Evaluation of the IEEE 802.11ah Restricted Access Window Mechanism for dense IoT networks. Seventeeth International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), Ciombra, Portugal.
[16] Khorov, E., Lyakhov, A., Krotov, A., & Guschin, A. (2015). A survey on IEEE 802.11 ah: An enabling networking technology for smart cities. Computer Communications, 58, 53-69.
[17] M. Park, TGah Efficient TIM Encoding, 2012.
[18] J. Kim, RAW Assignment follow up, 2013.
[19] He, G. (2002). Destination-sequenced distance vector (DSDV) protocol. Networking Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland.
[20] Clausen, T., Jacquet, P., Adjih, C., Laouiti, A., Minet, P., Muhlethaler, P., ... & Viennot, L. (2003). Optimized link state routing protocol (OLSR).
[21] Muhtadi, A., Perdana, D., & Munadi, R. (2015). Performance Evaluation of AODV, DSDV, and ZRP Using Vehicular Traffic Load Balancing Scheme on VANETs. International Journal of Simulation, Systems, Science, and Technology, United Kingdom Simulation Society.
[22] Perdana, D., & Sari, R. F. (2013). Mobility Models Performance Analysis using Random Dijkstra Algorithm and Doppler Effect for IEEE 1609.4 Standard. International Journal of Simulation, Systems, Science, and Technology, United Kingdom Simulation Society.