Performance Comparison of Three Modified Howland Current Source Circuits in Low-Cost Bioimpedance Analyzer for Bio-Phantom Signal Acquisition
Main Article Content
Abstract
Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) supports recent advancements in gastric monitoring for telehealth applications. The challenge in providing low-cost EIT is ensuring a stable current injection over diverse tissue conductivities within the abdominal cavity. Three current source circuits based on Howland's current source are investigated to be applied in a low-cost portable bioimpedance analyzer (p-BIA). Those are: a) triple amplifier Howland current source (TAHCS), b) mirrored Howland current source (MHCS), and c) composite mirrored Howland current source (CMHCS). Evaluation has been conducted based on signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), broadness of the frequency range, and output impedance over frequency value and stability. Due to its high SNR value (82.56 to 102.1 dB), broad (500 Hz to 500 kHz) operating frequency, and consistent output impedance over operating frequency (10 to 25 kΩ), CMHCS is a good option in realizing p-BIA in gastric monitoring based EIT.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work