Analisis Simulasi Penerapan Algoritma OSPF Menggunakan RouteFlow pada Jaringan Software Defined Network (SDN)

Article Sidebar

View PDF
Published Feb 12, 2017
DOI https://doi.org/10.20895/infotel.v9i1.172

Main Article Content

Ridha Muldina Negara
Universitas Telkom
Rohmat Tulloh
Universitas Telkom

Abstract

Pada jaringan konvensional, konfigurasi protocol routing sangat tidak fleksibel, tidak efisien dan konfigurasi dilakukan pada tiap perangkat. Hal ini tentu saja tidak dapat memenuhi tuntutan operasional saat ini yang rata-rata memiliki jaringan yang besar dan perangkat jaringan yang memiliki spesifikasi berbeda. Software Defined Network (SDN) muncul sebagai harapan untuk permasalahan kompleksitas jaringan konvensional. Paradigma baru SDN melakukan pemisahan antara control plane dan forwarding plane. RouteFlow merupakan salah satu komponen berbasis software yang dapat mengaplikasikan protocol routing konvensional pada jaringan SDN. Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) merupakan sebuah protokol routing konvensional yang memiliki kemampuan untuk mendeteksi perubahan topologi jaringan dengan cepat dalam sebuah jaringan yang besar. Protokol routing OSPF diterapkan pada teknologi SDN menggunakan RouteFlow dengan tujuan untuk mempermudah dalam mengontrol jaringan dengan sistem terpusat. Convergence time dan parameter Quality of Service (Throughput, Delay, Jitter dan Packet Loss) diukur dengan skenario pemutusan link, penambahan jumlah switch dan background traffic.  Hasil pengukuran convergence time menunjukan bahwa penambahan jumlah switch mempengaruhi pertambahan waktu konvergensi, sedangkan untuk parameter Quality of Service (QoS) pada peningkatan topologi switch didapatkan hasil yang masih sesuai dengan standar ITU-T G.1010 namun apabila ditambahkan background traffic yang memenuhi 50% bandwidth jaringan maka QoS memburuk.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
R. Negara and R. Tulloh, “Analisis Simulasi Penerapan Algoritma OSPF Menggunakan RouteFlow pada Jaringan Software Defined Network (SDN)”, INFOTEL, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 75-83, Feb. 2017.
Issue
Vol 9 No 1 (2017): February 2017
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work 

References

[1] Rawat Danda B, Reddy. Swetha R., "Software Defined Networking Architecture, Security and Energy Efficiency: A Survey," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 2016.
[2] D. Kreutz, F. M. Ramos, P. Esteves Verissimo, C. Esteve Rothenberg, S. Azodolmolky, and S. Uhlig, "Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey," IEEE Proceedings, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 14–76, 2015.
[3] B. Heller, R. Sherwood, N. McKeown, "The Controller Placement Problem," First Workshop on Hot Topics in Software-Defined Networks, pp. 7-12, 2012.
[4] Zhang, H., & Yan, J. (2015). Performance of SDN Routing in Comparison with Legacy Routing Protocol. 2015 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery, 0–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberC.2015.30
[5] Zeng, P., Nguyen, K., Shen, Y., & Yamada, S. (2014). On The Resilence of Software Defined Routing Platform. APNOMS.
[6] ONF White Paper, "Software-Defined Networking: The New Norm for Networks", ONF, (2012).
[7] Sudiyatmoko, Abu Riza, Sofia Naning Hertiana, and Ridha Muldina Negara. "Analisis Performansi Perutingan Link State Menggunakan Algoritma Djikstra Pada Platform Software Defined Network (SDN)." JURNAL INFOTEL 8.1 (2016): 40-46.
[8] Nakahodo, Y., Naito, T., & Oki, E. (2014). IMPLEMENTATION OF SMART-OSPF IN HYBRID SOFTWARE-DEFINED NETWORK. IEEE IC-NIDC 2014, 0–4. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7000328/
[9] ONF White Paper, "SDN Architecture Overview", ONF, (2013).
[10] Moy, J. (1998). OSPF Version 2. IETF.
[11] RouteFlow, Diunduh pada laman http://www.OpenFlowhub.org/display/RouteFlow/RouteFlow+Home\
[12] M. Nascimento, C. Rothenberg, M. Salvador, C. Corrêa, S. Lucena, and M. Magalhães, "Virtual routers as a service: the RouteFlow approach leveraging software-defined networks", Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Future Internet Technologies, (2011) June 13-15; Seoul, Korea..
[13] Quagga Routing Suite, http://www.nongnu.org/quagga/.
[14] M. Nascimento, C. Rothenberg, M. Salvador, and M. Magalhães, QuagFlow: Partnering Quagga with OpenFlow. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2010 conference, (2010) August 30-September 3; New Delhi, India.
[15] Production Quality, Multilayer Open Virtual Switch, openvswitch.org, 2016.