Assessment decisions of independent learning activities using SMART–FCM method
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer (STIKOM) PGRI Banyuwangi implemented the Independent Learning - Independent Campus (MBKM) activity for two semesters. The results of student assessments for MBKM activities for one semester are influenced by the results of daily and weekly logbook monitoring, monitoring and evaluation assessments, and assessments of supervisors, examiners, and work partners. Assessments that are less objective cause many students to get good grades even though the implementation of MBKM activities is not well. The Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) method is used to produce student eligibility group data and a more objective assessment. The results of the SMART calculations are combined with the Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) algorithm so that the results of grouping student data are more appropriate based on the similarities and characteristics of the members. Silhouette Coefficient is used to compare the grouping results. The results obtained that the use of SMART-FCM is better than the SMART results because it has a Silhouette Coefficient value close to 1 of 0.31187.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work